Llama matemática

Your awesome Tagline

126,862 notes

pancakeke:
“ pancakeke:
“ the-cadence-of-yellow:
“ pancakeke:
“ thekilleropekui:
“ pancakeke:
“this covers the hole but it’s really obstructive and ruins the aesthetic of the bowl
I’m considering making a decoy bowl now
”
All cats ruin the aesthetics...

pancakeke:

pancakeke:

the-cadence-of-yellow:

pancakeke:

thekilleropekui:

pancakeke:

this covers the hole but it’s really obstructive and ruins the aesthetic of the bowl
I’m considering making a decoy bowl now

All cats ruin the aesthetics if it doesn’t revolve around them.

image

related: aesthetic cat bed that has only been used 2 times in the past 2 years. they prefer to sleep in Amazon boxes

@pancakeke you should put the amazon box inside the aesthetic cat bed. Maybe they’ll be more inclined to use it that way

image

if this works I will lose my damn mind

image

ARE YOU KIDDING ME

(via leadhoovesies)

359,294 notes

vampiricyoshi:

neilnevins:

neilnevins:

Bugs Bunny could singlehandedly defeat Thanos by dressing up as a TSA agent and setting up a metal detector in the middle of the battlefield saying that all metal objects must be removed if you want to pass on through now stick around for my 2,000 word essay on just how effectively he would convince The Mad Titan to comply

“For shame, doc! Dontcha know we got other folks waiting?”

(Thanos looks behind him and sees dozens of Bugs Bunnies dressed as angry yelling travelers with huge bags of luggage. Thanos rubs his neck guiltily and begins sliding off the gauntlet)

image
image
image
image
image

I felt compelled

(via leadhoovesies)

180,619 notes

fouriest:

evr-more:

scourge-the-higher:

anybodyandsomebody:

panickedscorpio:

ruinedchildhood:

Incredibles 2 (2018)

These movies continue to be super real

I feel you, Bob.

Fun fact: The way most people were taught math in America is actually based on memorization and repetition instead of fully grasping and mastering the material. “New Math” is how the education system is trying to make amends for their mistakes in the past when instead of teaching you why 3x5 is 15, they just had you memorize it. There are tons of different ways to come to the correct answer for a math problem (which seems obvious but when you are learning how to add and subtract, that thought isn’t always presented to you) and this new program is introducing children to other options for understanding and mastering math. We get frustrated because we learned it one way and since it has always worked for us, we don’t want to change it. In reality, our way is just as quick as a lot of other methods out there. Instead of 3x5=15, we learn that it is 3+3+3+3+3 or 5+5+5. Instead of “carrying the one” we learn that we could add each individual amount at the end: 
  129
+134
=    13(9+4)+50(20+30)+200(100+100) = 263
Different cultures teach different methods for math problems so it would only make sense that the U.S. starts to catch up and teach more methods for a wider variety of students– especially because not every student is going to be able to grasp the same concept in the same way. (I swear I’m not just sprouting random crap, I’m actually an elementary education major)

@fouriest 

this is awesome! It’s sort of how I taught myself how to do basic arithmetic when I had to re-learn it before starting engineering. 

Basically, the way I was taught as a kid is to work from the right to the left, if that makes sense (the “ones” place, then the “tens” place, etc). So if we want to add say,

  129

+134

We start with 9+4 = 13, then leave the 3 (so we know the last digit of the answer is 3) and “carry the one” to the next place where we have 2+3+(1) = 6, then to the next place we just have 1+1=2, so the final answer is 2:6:3 = 263

Another way to do it, the way the previous post describes, is more like grouping by magnitude. We can think of 129 = 100+20+9, and 134 = 100+30+4

So instead of the old way, we can also do (100+100)+(20+30)+(4+9) = 200+50+13 = 263

This also works really well for multiplication. Eg, 317*17, which I can’t do in my head. But we can break it down into: (300+17)*(10+7), which you can then FOIL (First, Outer, Inner, Last, remember that?) into (300*10)+(300*7)+(17*10)+(17*7) most of which I can do in my head: 3000+2100+170+(17*7)

The last bit we can do as (10+7)*7 = 10*7+7*7 = 70*49 = 119

So the final answer is 3000+2100+170+119 = 5389

Another thing I learned how to do was division without doing the long division  way (which I HATED), by thinking about it like multiplication.

Take 168/13, which I can absolutely not solve by long division. Instead, I’ll think of it like multiplication: what times 13 = 168

I know 10*13 = 130, which is too low, and 20*13 = 260 which is too high. But we can start from 10*13=130 and just count by 13′s: 11*13 = 143, 12*13 = 156, . If we go any farther we’ll be bigger than 168, so we know that 13 goes into 168 12 times with remainder (168-156 = 12)

So the final answer is 12+12/13

(Source: ruinedchildhood, via math-memes)